[Samba] Disable Pam checking for Samba4 Standalone role server with samdb_dbds as passdb backend !

[CpServiceSPb .]

Really, I have seen again.
I don' t understand at the moment, why my messages is posted separatelly. I
am sorry.
I will look at it later (for reason) .
My previous messages (previous moths) were within the same thread.




2014-06-17 1:03 GMT+04:00 Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net>:

>  From what I can tell, you simply don't understand the basic issues at
> play.
> This results in you demanding that people, who actually know how things
> work, provide you *proof.*
>
> Really, proof? They're doing this as a community service, and you want
> *proof?*
>
> Might it be enough that the way you're trying it doesn't work? That seems
> like "proof" to me.
>
> It seems pointless to waste my [or anyone else's] time even attempting to
> help you. You'll simply waste that time and when you don't get what you
> want [which, BTW, is impossible] you'll spit in my eye too. [That seems
> like just a great idea, where do I sign up? <sarcasm>]
>
>
>
> *C> ...you behave as angry, bad mannered chield. C> ;)) *Google the word
> "projection." You might find it useful.
>
> PLONK.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *>> I answered your initial post and pointed you at the samba wiki, you >>
> either didn't read it, understand it, or choose to ignore it. Your >>
> question was a bit stupid, so I answered it the same ;-) C> If you would be
> more attentive and put off your guru crown you would be C> able to see,
> that: firstly I read Wiki link, and partical content could be C>
> interpreted in doubled way. in my oppinion. What I wrote about. >> You mean
> bad manners like keep opening new threads rather than replying C> in the
> thread ? C> Hurrah, hurrah, you have found something really stupid, have
> you. It' s one C> more your intelegent conclusion. But there is no so. C>
> It' s some issue of my e-mail client. I will check it tomorrow. >> I don't
> have to give you any proof what so ever, I don't even have to >> point you
> at what will help you get to where you want to be. C> Also I posted that if
> you somebody has his/her oppinion (he/she may of C> course) and make that
> others oppinion/assumption/question is stupid WITHOUT C> proofs, C> either
> it is his/her non realized se...al fantasies or some foolish C> conclusions
> or mind garbage or some kind of illness. Choose in yourself C> variant what
> is up to you. C> You are likely a Samba guru but you behave as angry, bad
> mannered chield. C> ;)) C> But, if you don' t have any valuble to say
> within tech side of the topic, C> please, at least, stop, don' t garbage
> it. Ok ? :) >> If you do find a way to get samba working without nsswitch,
> please do >> let us know, you will have made a major breakthrough ;-) C>
> But many things are possible in this world, in this time. -;) C> For
> example, I end up some Samba4 feature (connected with NetBrowsing) , C>
> though, initially somebody said that it is impossible or rather can be C>
> implementing. C> I will post if I find non-nssswitch solution... *
>