[Samba] Proper unix ownership/Permissions for top level share

[JD Daniels]

The released 0.6.2 version does not - 0.6.3 will when it comes out, I 
have built my own rpms that include the acl functionality - ACL is 
working great :)

Once I add rw to the folders, I can control permissions correctly with 
RSAT without issue. I dont have any linux clients that use the server, 
all access is through SMB with authentication/authorization from active 
directory, It just seems wrong having full RW permissions at the linux 
level.

--
JD Daniels

On 6/3/2014 8:51 AM, Danilo Mussolini wrote:
> As far as I know, ZFS on Linux still doesn't support ACL.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, JD Daniels <jd at internetguys.ca 
> <mailto:jd at internetguys.ca>> wrote:
>
>     I am using zfs on linux to store my file shares on. When I create
>     a new file system, they have the following permissions:
>
>     [root at server ~]# zfs create tank/testsystem
>     [root at server ~]# ls -Al /tank
>     drwxrwxrwx+  10 root    root   27 Jun  2 20:10 Software
>     drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root    2 Jun  3 07:43 testsystem
>
>     At this point, if I use the rsat and attempt to set ACL, I get
>     permission denied. adding rwx to everyone, as the "software"
>     system shows above, then the rsat work as expected (and i get the
>     + indicating ACL has been set.)
>
>     However, having my root folder sitting with rwx is rubbing me the
>     wrong way - I don't think that is how it should be.
>
>     Could someone elucidate for me what the proper unix
>     ownership/permissions should be for my top level shares? Is there
>     a set of acls I can apply on the unix side as part of my file
>     system creation?
>
>     I am using Samba 4.1.7 previsioned as a primary domain controller
>     (Active directory, not NT style)
>
>     -- 
>     JD Daniels
>
>     -- 
>     To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>     instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>