[Samba] Copy private to another samba instance

Chan Min Wai dcmwai at gmail.com
Thu Feb 13 23:50:33 MST 2014

Hi Michal,

Just double if you DLZ module is for 9.9?


the default is to 9.7 which will caused sometime like this...

Thank you.

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Michał Półrolniczak <
michal.polrolniczak at warp.org.pl> wrote:

> Simply,
> when I switched from internal to bind9.9 had few problems with ddns,
> then after some tuning it worked ok, after reboot it was looking like
> only few DC clients could update they dns record other had denide at
> log. Now the bind9 exit with:
>  db.c:463: ENSURE(*versionp == ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
> #0 0x4250d6 in assertion_failed()+0x46
> #1 0x5b04ca in isc_assertion_failed()+0xa
> #2 0x47b686 in dns_db_closeversion()+0x76
> #3 0x44db50 in update_action()+0x3ca0
> #4 0x5d0e22 in isc__taskmgr_dispatch()+0x242
> #5 0x5d3f3f in evloop()+0x9f
> #6 0x5d448f in isc__app_ctxrun()+0x7f
> #7 0x416057 in main()+0xd87
> #8 0x7fc282b3e76d in _fini()+0x7fc282558ed5
> #9 0x416345 in _start()+0x29
> exiting (due to assertion failure)
> It throw this when there are few people in domain active, when there is
> few computers bind works. I didn't change anything named.conf related,
> and the rights are same.
> Before that the main problem with ddns was that using ms dns console i
> saw that every dns row is static and not dynamic, thats why the ddns
> didnt work. Removing it with ldbdel tool workd but I wanted quicker way
> - so I select them in DNS console, removed them and  from that moment i
> think the DNS broke up.
> So I would be happy to know if theres a safe way to transfer
> users/computers/gpo to clean samba4 installation without draging the dns.
> Oh btw, now when I switched back to inernal all dns rows are adding as
> static and not dynamic - samba4 4.1.4 Is that a bug?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

More information about the samba mailing list