[Samba] Copy private to another samba instance

[Chan Min Wai]

Hi Michal,

Just double if you DLZ module is for 9.9?

/var/lib/samba/private/namd.conf

the default is to 9.7 which will caused sometime like this...

Thank you.


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Michał Półrolniczak <
michal.polrolniczak at warp.org.pl> wrote:

> Simply,
>
> when I switched from internal to bind9.9 had few problems with ddns,
> then after some tuning it worked ok, after reboot it was looking like
> only few DC clients could update they dns record other had denide at
> log. Now the bind9 exit with:
>
>  db.c:463: ENSURE(*versionp == ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
> #0 0x4250d6 in assertion_failed()+0x46
> #1 0x5b04ca in isc_assertion_failed()+0xa
> #2 0x47b686 in dns_db_closeversion()+0x76
> #3 0x44db50 in update_action()+0x3ca0
> #4 0x5d0e22 in isc__taskmgr_dispatch()+0x242
> #5 0x5d3f3f in evloop()+0x9f
> #6 0x5d448f in isc__app_ctxrun()+0x7f
> #7 0x416057 in main()+0xd87
> #8 0x7fc282b3e76d in _fini()+0x7fc282558ed5
> #9 0x416345 in _start()+0x29
> exiting (due to assertion failure)
>
> It throw this when there are few people in domain active, when there is
> few computers bind works. I didn't change anything named.conf related,
> and the rights are same.
> Before that the main problem with ddns was that using ms dns console i
> saw that every dns row is static and not dynamic, thats why the ddns
> didnt work. Removing it with ldbdel tool workd but I wanted quicker way
> - so I select them in DNS console, removed them and  from that moment i
> think the DNS broke up.
>
> So I would be happy to know if theres a safe way to transfer
> users/computers/gpo to clean samba4 installation without draging the dns.
>
> Oh btw, now when I switched back to inernal all dns rows are adding as
> static and not dynamic - samba4 4.1.4 Is that a bug?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>