[Samba] Windows drive mapping using alternate port
Kris Springer
kspringer at innovateteam.com
Thu Feb 6 13:19:01 MST 2014
Unchecking such a box would be ideal and may solve my problem. Where is
this checkbox found?
Thanks.
Kris
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Weiss [mailto:cweiss at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 12:11 PM
To: Kris Springer
Cc: Günter Kukkukk; samba
Subject: Re: [Samba] Windows drive mapping using alternate port
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Kris Springer <kspringer at innovateteam.com>
wrote:
> I've got 50 remote users possibly doubling in the next year. The idea
> is to map a drive that they have easy and constant access to. If I
> tell everyone to VPN then the traffic on my server's network will go
> through the roof since all traffic for everyone will route through the
> VPN and not their local networks for regular internet use. Skype
> would become unusable as well as a few other things. A VPN would be
> ideal if it were only a few users that accessed the shares
> intermittently, but for 50+ users with constant access it's not really
> feasible. Is this starting to sound like a situation where remote
> access just isn't going to work? Is Samba simply a local file sharing
server that isn't really useful in today's remote world?
> Is there some other alternative that someone could suggest?
>
uncheck the "route all traffic through vpn" box.
More information about the samba
mailing list