[Samba] IDMAP_NSS on member server
Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 10:24:42 MST 2014
I don't have an AD backend for this domain. The DC's are "classic"
domain controllers, Samba 3.6 , with LDAP backend for all accounts.
Would this still be an option?
I tried adding
idmap config MYDOMAIN:schema_mode = rfc2307
idmap config MYDOMAIN:backend = ad
idmap config MYDOMAIN:range = 100-300
Didn't seem to work.
Thanks
On 12/18/14 11:57, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 18/12/14 16:43, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>> I think IDMAP_RID would not be the appropriate solution for me. Not
>> only do I want consistent IDMapping across all servers - which this
>> could do - but I want them to match the the existing unix uidNumber
>> in LDAP.
>
> You never said that you had uidNumber in LDAP!, in fact you seemed to
> mention every winbind backend except the one that uses the rfc2307
> attributes.
>
> Stop messing around and use the winbind ad backend.
>
> Rowland
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/18/14 04:29, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On 17/12/14 22:01, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>>>> I have two Samba 3.6.24 domain controllers (Solaris 10.) On
>>>> all machines unix accounts and groups are in the LDAP as well as
>>>> idmap entries for trusted domains. Samba accounts on domain
>>>> controllers are in LDAP so there is problem with consistency
>>>> unix/windows id and group mapping on the domain controllers. The
>>>> domain controllers are the main file servers as well.
>>>>
>>>> I am configuring a new member server, also Samba 3.6.4 (Solaris
>>>> 11.) On the member server, I have joined the domain. When
>>>> accessing shared directory from a Windows 7 machine as a regular
>>>> user, I can only access files that I am the owner. Group is
>>>> ignored. The Security properties of files (from windows) show
>>>> users and groups as "Unix User\myname" and "Unix Group\mygroup."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Winbind is running on both the domain controller and the member
>>>> server. The "wbinfo -u" and "winfo -g" commands show the users and
>>>> groups. This machine does not need to support trusted
>>>> domains. It looks like I need some sort of IDMapping. SInce
>>>> I have unix accounts in LDAP backend I was trying to configure
>>>> idmap_nss.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> idmap config MYDOMAIN : backend = nss
>>>> idmap config MYDOMAIN : range = 100-300
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> log.192.168.0.105
>>>> wbinfo correctly translates between names and SIDs
>>>>
>>>> :/# wbinfo -n myname
>>>> S-1-5-21-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-1234 SID_USER (1)
>>>> :/# S-1-5-21-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-1234
>>>> MYDOMAIN\myname 1
>>>> /#
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> however any translation between SID (or name) and unix uidnumber fails
>>>>
>>>> /# wbinfo -S S-1-5-21-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-1234
>>>> failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
>>>> Could not convert sid S-1-5-21-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-1234 to uid
>>>> /#
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Member servers have always been problematic no matter what I try
>>>> (ldap backed, idmap_nss, idmap_rid, winbind trusted domains only =
>>>> yes) and on Solaris and Linux samba machines of various verions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also tried
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> idmap config MYDOMAIN : backend = rid
>>>> idmap config MYDOMAIN : range = 100-300
>>>> idmap config MYDOMAIN : base_rid = 0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> but no luck.
>>>
>>> Not surprised really, the rid is calculated using this formula:
>>>
>>> ID = RID - BASE_RID + LOW_RANGE_ID.
>>>
>>> So, using the info you posted above:
>>>
>>> ID = 1234 - 0 + 100
>>>
>>> Which becomes:
>>>
>>> ID = 1334
>>>
>>> There is your problem, The ID number is larger than the high range
>>> you set in smb.conf, try adding a couple of zero's to the range, i.e
>>> change 100-300 to 100-30000
>>>
>>> Rowland
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> idmap_nss support is enabled
>>>>
>>>> # smbd -b | grep idmap_nss
>>>> pdb_ldap pdb_smbpasswd pdb_tdbsam pdb_wbc_sam idmap_tdb
>>>> idmap_passdb idmap_nss nss_info_template auth_sam auth_unix
>>>> auth_winbind auth_wbc auth_server auth_domain auth_builtin
>>>> vfs_default vfs_solarisacl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> # smbd -b | grep idmap_rid
>>>> idmap_rid_init
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any idea what I am missing?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the samba
mailing list