[Samba] FW: samba 2.2.7a tech issue

[Rowland Penny]

On 05/12/14 08:03, Uday Mhatre wrote:
> ________________________________
> From: Uday Mhatre<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com>
> Sent: ‎05-‎12-‎2014 12:58
> To: Andrea Venturoli<mailto:ml at netfence.it>
> Subject: RE: [Samba] samba 2.2.7a tech issue
>
> Just wondering if these samba versions are backward compatible with fedora14 and other Linux distributions.
>
> Regards,
> Uday
> ________________________________
> From: Uday Mhatre<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com>
> Sent: ‎04-‎12-‎2014 21:36
> To: TAKAHASHI Motonobu<mailto:monyo at monyo.com>
> Subject: RE: [Samba] samba 2.2.7a tech issue
>
> I have  it  working in 3.0,but not in 2.2.
>
>
> Regards,
> Uday
> ________________________________
> From: TAKAHASHI Motonobu<mailto:monyo at monyo.com>
> Sent: ‎04-‎12-‎2014 21:08
> To: ml at netfence.it<mailto:ml at netfence.it>; uday_mhatre at hotmail.com<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com>
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org<mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>; ""@monyo.com<mailto:%22%22 at monyo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Samba] samba 2.2.7a tech issue
>
>> On 12/03/14 18:22, Uday Mhatre wrote:
>>
>>> A technical problem ,after installing samba package and samba-common
>>> 2.2.7a.
>>> Net command is not found with this installation.
>> I don't remember NET being in 2.x, but I might be wrong (it's been a long
>> time since I had my hands on that version).
> "net" command was first introduced in Samba 3.0.0.
> What do you want to do with "net"?
>
>> Bottom line is: Samba 2.2 has been discontinued years ago; you'd better
>> upgrade to 4.1.
> +1.
>
> ---
> TAKAHASHI Motonobu <monyo at monyo.com> / @damemonyo
>                     facebook.com/takahashi.motonobu
>

Never mind updating samba, you need to use a recent distro as well :-)

Rowland