[Samba] Domain users not resolving...
Ryan Ashley
ryana at reachtechfp.com
Mon Aug 25 12:16:09 MDT 2014
Fair enough. I will double and triple-check the removal. Also, all roles are on DC01. Once DC02 is up with Wheezy I will report back my success or failure. Thanks again for your advice and help.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> </div><div>Date:2014/08/25 11:07 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: samba at lists.samba.org </div><div>Subject: Re: [Samba] Domain users not resolving... </div><div>
</div>Ryan,
...to avoid, so its a suggestion... but if you want to.. you can ..
as long as the old data is completely removed from the AD Database and DNS.
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: ryana at reachtechfp.com
>[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ryan Ashley
>Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2014 17:01
>Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Domain users not resolving...
>
>Alright, but I am curious as to why I would not use the same
>name or IP
>address? Once I remove the DC and verify it is gone using the AD tools
>in Windows, what would be the harm? I ask because the prior
>company does
>have a good network setup and naming scheme (similar to our own,
>actually) and I would like to reuse it. I'm going to start
>reading those
>articles now. Thanks for the help, I appreciate it.
>
>On 8/25/2014 10:33 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>> You have 2 dc's. thats good.
>> Wel now its easy...
>>
>> first check where the FSMO Roles are running and if needed
>move them all to DC1.
>> samba-tool fsmo show
>> see:
>(https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Flexible_Single-Master_Operat
>ions_(FSMO)_roles)
>>
>> remove the old server from the domain,
>> see: ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demote_a_Samba_DC )
>>
>> and i advice to use an other name and other IP, to avoid
>possible problems with the old name/ip of the old server.
>> and install the new server and join the domain and let it
>sync its DB.
>> etc etc.
>> start from here i suggest.
>> You know where to find us. ;-)
>>
>> Greetz,
>>
>> Louis
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>> Van: ryana at reachtechfp.com
>>> [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ryan Ashley
>>> Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2014 16:19
>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Domain users not resolving...
>>>
>>> Rowland, I would LOVE to upgrade, but as I am brand-new to
>>> this location
>>> and it has this borked Samba install, I am hesitant. Is there
>>> a guide or
>>> wiki article on the correct way to do this? If it was just
>going from
>>> Squeeze to Wheezy, that's cake! I am more concerned with the
>>> location of
>>> everything relating to Samba. Since it is all on "/samba", what do I
>>> need to backup? I am assuming the following is what I need
>to do, but
>>> must make sure first. I do not want to have to rebuild an
>>> entire domain
>>> if I can help it!
>>>
>>> /samba/etc -> /etc/samba
>>> /samba/lib -> /var/lib/samba
>>> /samba/private -> /var/lib/samba/private
>>> /samba/locks/sysvol -> /var/lib/samba/sysvol
>>>
>>> Is this correct? The locations on the right of the arrow are
>>> where those
>>> directories are on my functioning domain controllers at other
>>> locations.
>>> I've never seen a setup like this before. However, due to this
>>> location
>>> having TWO DC's, I could easily take one down, install Wheezy from
>>> scratch (clean install) and set it up correctly, allow it to
>>> sync, then
>>> do the other one. Am I correct in that?
>>>
>>> On 8/25/2014 9:45 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>>>> Hai Rowland,
>>>>
>>>> yeah.. i know.
>>>> The DC's are using sernet-samba and the links arent there
>>> because i dont use it. ;-)
>>>> Thats the same with the "Proper sysvol replication
>>> solution..." threat..
>>>> Yes i have mixed XIDs on my DC's, but i have all correct
>>> UIDs on my sysvol.
>>>> and yes, samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck gives. .
>>>> ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught
>>> exception etc...
>>>> but i dont mind. all my shares on the DC (sysvol and
>>> netlogon) ( used from within windows ) work 100% ok.
>>>> GPO is processed without errors so i dont care. i just dont
>>> run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck :-)
>>>> my logs on my DC are all (whole my debian server logs ) error free.
>>>> and i rechecked my windows logs after a login, after is saw
>>> the threat about it to be really long..
>>>> but same there 100% error free..
>>>>
>>>> But thanks for the notice!
>>>>
>>>> and for Ryan.
>>>>
>>>> The debian Samba (backports 4.1.11 ) paths
>>>> Paths:
>>>> SBINDIR: /usr/sbin
>>>> BINDIR: /usr/bin
>>>> CONFIGFILE: /etc/samba/smb.conf
>>>> LOGFILEBASE: /var/log/samba
>>>> LMHOSTSFILE: /etc/samba/lmhosts
>>>> LIBDIR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
>>>> MODULESDIR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba
>>>> SHLIBEXT: so
>>>> LOCKDIR: /var/run/samba
>>>> STATEDIR: /var/lib/samba
>>>> CACHEDIR: /var/cache/samba
>>>> PIDDIR: /var/run/samba
>>>> SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /etc/samba/smbpasswd
>>>> PRIVATE_DIR: /var/lib/samba/private
>>>>
>>>> just compare them with you local installed then stop samba,
>>> install backports samba, stop samba ( the backports version)
>>> copy the old files the above locations and start samba.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greetz,
>>>>
>>>> Louis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>>>> Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
>>>>> [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny
>>>>> Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2014 15:32
>>>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Domain users not resolving...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25/08/14 14:22, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>>>>>> Why dont you upgrade to debian Wheezy and start using or
>>>>> wheezy-backports samba of sernet-samba.
>>>>>> If you backup all your old samba files, the transfer for an
>>>>> own build of samba to debian samba ( or sernet samba )
>>>>>> isnt that hard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> about the id.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> on my DC : id user => not found, but must say, i dont use
>>>>> my dc for anything else but being a DC with sysvol.
>>>>>> getent passwd = > nothing ( and correct i dont have winbind
>>>>> set in my nsswitch.conf )
>>>>>> wbinfo -u = all my users
>>>>>> wbinfo -g = all my groups.
>>>>> Hi Louis, this is probably because you don't have the
>winbind links
>>>>> installed, on Debian using samba from backports this is
>>> easy, you just
>>>>> need to install a few packages, but when you compile samba4,
>>>>> you need to
>>>>> create a couple of symlinks. There used to be a samba4
>>> winbind page in
>>>>> the wiki, but this seems to have vanished.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>> on my member server : id user1 : uid=5003(user1)
>>>>> gid=5000(domain users) groups=5000(domain
>>>>>
>>>
>users),4294967295,4294967295,4294967295,4294967295,50002(BUILTIN\users)
>>>>>> getent passwd => only the users with UID assigned.
>>>>>> getent group => only groups with GID assigned.
>>>>>> wbinfo -u = all my users
>>>>>> wbinfo -g = all my groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but just a question for what are you using the RFC2307 uid
>>>>> on the DC server for?
>>>>>> Check if your smb.conf on all your Domain Controllers
>>>>> contain the following parameter in the „[global]“ section:
>>>>>> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ( see
>>> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Using_RFC2307_on_a_Samba_DC )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetz,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Louis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>>>>>> Van: ryana at reachtechfp.com
>>>>>>> [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ryan Ashley
>>>>>>> Verzonden: maandag 25 augustus 2014 14:59
>>>>>>> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
>>>>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Domain users not resolving...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08/23/2014 04:26 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23/08/14 01:19, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Rowland, I did not do this. This is a new client who
>>> dropped their
>>>>>>>>> old IT support due to issues on the network. I found out
>>>>> it was not
>>>>>>>>> having access to the sysvol. That is where I figured out
>>>>>>> what I have.
>>>>>>>>> I do use FHS in my builds, but I would never put it
>into a root
>>>>>>>>> directory like this. I guess the other team was testing
>>> Samba and
>>>>>>>>> using a client to test on! I do agree 100% that the
>issue is the
>>>>>>>>> path. However, I can feel good that I didn't do such a
>>>>>>> bone-headed move!
>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the lack of files, I had to figure out how it
>>>>> was set up.
>>>>>>>>> Everything, including the configuration file is in
>>> "/samba", which
>>>>>>>>> appears to be a separate partition. Here is what you
>requested.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Samba 4.1.11 64bit
>>>>>>>>> Debian Squeeze 64bit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> =========
>>>>>>>>> smb.conf:
>>>>>>>>> =========
>>>>>>>>> # Global parameters
>>>>>>>>> [global]
>>>>>>>>> workgroup = DOMAIN
>>>>>>>>> realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
>>>>>>>>> netbios name = DC01
>>>>>>>>> server role = active directory domain controller
>>>>>>>>> server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap,
>>>>> cldap, kdc,
>>>>>>>>> drepl, winbind, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate
>>>>>>>>> interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.0.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [netlogon]
>>>>>>>>> path = /samba/var/locks/sysvol/kigm.local/scripts
>>>>>>>>> read only = No
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [sysvol]
>>>>>>>>> path = /samba/var/locks/sysvol
>>>>>>>>> read only = No
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> =========
>>>>>>>>> krb5.conf:
>>>>>>>>> =========
>>>>>>>>> [libdefaults]
>>>>>>>>> default_realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
>>>>>>>>> dns_lookup_realm = false
>>>>>>>>> dns_lookup_kdc = true
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> =================
>>>>>>>>> Rowland's Request:
>>>>>>>>> =================
>>>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# /samba/sbin/samba -b
>>>>>>>>> Samba version: 4.1.11
>>>>>>>>> Build environment:
>>>>>>>>> Build host: Linux dc01 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue May 13
>>>>>>> 16:34:35
>>>>>>>>> UTC 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>>>>> Paths:
>>>>>>>>> BINDIR: /samba/bin
>>>>>>>>> SBINDIR: /samba/sbin
>>>>>>>>> CONFIGFILE: /samba/etc/smb.conf
>>>>>>>>> NCALRPCDIR: /samba/var/run/ncalrpc
>>>>>>>>> LOGFILEBASE: /samba/var
>>>>>>>>> LMHOSTSFILE: /samba/etc/lmhosts
>>>>>>>>> DATADIR: /samba/share
>>>>>>>>> MODULESDIR: /samba/lib
>>>>>>>>> LOCKDIR: /samba/var/lock
>>>>>>>>> STATEDIR: /samba/var/locks
>>>>>>>>> CACHEDIR: /samba/var/cache
>>>>>>>>> PIDDIR: /samba/var/run
>>>>>>>>> PRIVATE_DIR: /samba/private
>>>>>>>>> CODEPAGEDIR: /samba/share/codepages
>>>>>>>>> SETUPDIR: /samba/share/setup
>>>>>>>>> WINBINDD_SOCKET_DIR: /samba/var/run/winbindd
>>>>>>>>> WINBINDD_PRIVILEGED_SOCKET_DIR:
>>>>>>> /samba/var/lib/winbindd_privileged
>>>>>>>>> NTP_SIGND_SOCKET_DIR: /samba/var/lib/ntp_signd
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No ID's have been setup. The rfc2307 stuff is there, but
>>>>>>> they're not
>>>>>>>>> using it. They have two Samba DC's and everything else is
>>>>>>> Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>> They were using rsync to sync the sysvol, which had
>>> caused issues
>>>>>>>>> with GID/UID on the second DC, but I fixed that already.
>>>>>>> Well, tried
>>>>>>>>> to anyway. It is setup the EXACT same way. It also has
>>> issues with
>>>>>>>>> this stuff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have a theory as to how to fix this but want advice
>>>>>>> first. If I am
>>>>>>>>> wrong, so be it. I would like to build Samba the STANDARD
>>>>> way (FHS,
>>>>>>>>> bin files go to /bin, etc) but have one concern. If I do
>>>>> this, do I
>>>>>>>>> simply need to adjust the paths in the configuration
>>> file and move
>>>>>>>>> the sysvol to the proper location? On all of the systems
>>>>> I do, this
>>>>>>>>> is always "/var/lib/samba/sysvol". I would obviously have
>>>>>>> to move the
>>>>>>>>> tdb files and such to "/var/lib/samba" as well. Would
>>>>> that work, or
>>>>>>>>> am I going to have to deal with this the way it is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you need anything else, please ask. Remember, this
>>> is a DC and
>>>>>>>>> while rfc2307 attributes exist, they're not being used.
>>>>>>> Probably due
>>>>>>>>> to no Linux member servers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 8/22/2014 4:54 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 22/08/14 21:40, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.08.2014 20:48, schrieb Ryan Ashley:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I stepped into a setup where Samba was compiled and
>>>>>>> installed into
>>>>>>>>>>>> "/samba". The configure command on the DC is "configure
>>>>>>>>>>>> --prefix=/samba". The links for libnss_wins.so.2 and
>>>>>>>>>>>> libnss_winbind.so.2
>>>>>>>>>>>> are there and nsswitch.conf is told to use winbind.
>>>>>>> However, "getent
>>>>>>>>>>>> group" returns only local users, "id" finds NO domain
>>>>> users, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> "getent
>>>>>>>>>>>> passwd" returns only local users. I did do a rebuild of
>>>>>>> Samba after
>>>>>>>>>>>> verifying the dependencies were there and
>>>>>>> configured/installed the
>>>>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>>>>> way so everything is in place. Still no dice. This guy
>>>>> was still
>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>> Debian Squeeze so the install is probably old. Things
>>>>>>> seem to run,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> no systems can access the sysvol even after a reset,
>>>>>>> which led to
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, my thinking is that maybe the binaries in
>>>>>>> "/samba/bin" should be
>>>>>>>>>>>> linked to "/bin" and the same goes for the sbin stuff.
>>>>>>> Is this my
>>>>>>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>>>>>> or what am I looking at? Yes, I stepped into it
>this time...
>>>>>>>>>>> It would be much easier to help, if you give some
>>>>>>> information about
>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - smb.conf
>>>>>>>>>>> - Samba version
>>>>>>>>>>> - IDs, etc. configured in your backend (depending on
>>> your Idmap
>>>>>>>>>>> config)
>>>>>>>>>>> - etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Marc
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It would also help if you followed the howto and didn't
>>>>>>> change bits
>>>>>>>>>> that you don't like, just why did you install into /samba
>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>>> /usr/local/samba ?
>>>>>>>>>> Everything out there is based on self compiling into
>>>>>>>>>> /usr/local/samba, the wiki gives you the instructions
>>>>>>> based on this.
>>>>>>>>>> having said this, it is possibly/probably a path problem,
>>>>>>> could you
>>>>>>>>>> please post (along with what Marc has asked for) the
>result of
>>>>>>>>>> 'samba -b'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>>>> OK, what does 'echo "$PATH"' return, does it have
>'/samba/sbin' &
>>>>>>>> '/samba/bin' in it ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If not, try this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> export PATH=/samba/sbin:/samba/bin:$PATH
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if everything now works correctly, do this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> echo "PATH=/samba/sbin:/samba/bin:$PATH" >
>>> /etc/profile.d/samba4.sh
>>>>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>>> Rowland, nothing in /samba is in the path. I had already
>>> tried your
>>>>>>> suggestion, but I did it again this morning and here are my
>>>>>>> results. It
>>>>>>> does not fix the issue. I also included some configuration
>>>>>>> files and such.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# echo "$PATH"
>>>>>>> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# export PATH=$PATH:/samba/bin:/samba/sbin
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# id maliag
>>>>>>> id: maliag: No such user
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# id michaelh
>>>>>>> id: michaelh: No such user
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# getent passwd
>>>>>>> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
>>>>>>> daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> bin:x:2:2:bin:/bin:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> sys:x:3:3:sys:/dev:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> sync:x:4:65534:sync:/bin:/bin/sync
>>>>>>> games:x:5:60:games:/usr/games:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> man:x:6:12:man:/var/cache/man:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> lp:x:7:7:lp:/var/spool/lpd:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> mail:x:8:8:mail:/var/mail:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> news:x:9:9:news:/var/spool/news:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> uucp:x:10:10:uucp:/var/spool/uucp:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> proxy:x:13:13:proxy:/bin:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> www-data:x:33:33:www-data:/var/www:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> backup:x:34:34:backup:/var/backups:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> list:x:38:38:Mailing List Manager:/var/list:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> irc:x:39:39:ircd:/var/run/ircd:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> gnats:x:41:41:Gnats Bug-Reporting System
>>>>> (admin):/var/lib/gnats:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/nonexistent:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> libuuid:x:100:101::/var/lib/libuuid:/bin/sh
>>>>>>> ntp:x:101:103::/home/ntp:/bin/false
>>>>>>> sshd:x:102:65534::/var/run/sshd:/usr/sbin/nologin
>>>>>>> bind:x:103:105::/var/cache/bind:/bin/false
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# cat /samba/etc/smb.conf
>>>>>>> # Global parameters
>>>>>>> [global]
>>>>>>> workgroup = KIGM
>>>>>>> realm = KIGM.LOCAL
>>>>>>> netbios name = DC01
>>>>>>> server role = active directory domain controller
>>>>>>> server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap,
>>> cldap, kdc,
>>>>>>> drepl, winbind, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate
>>>>>>> interfaces = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.0.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [netlogon]
>>>>>>> path = /samba/var/locks/sysvol/kigm.local/scripts
>>>>>>> read only = No
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [sysvol]
>>>>>>> path = /samba/var/locks/sysvol
>>>>>>> read only = No
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
>>>>>>> # /etc/nsswitch.conf
>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # Example configuration of GNU Name Service Switch
>functionality.
>>>>>>> # If you have the `glibc-doc-reference' and `info' packages
>>>>>>> installed, try:
>>>>>>> # `info libc "Name Service Switch"' for information about
>>> this file.
>>>>>>> passwd: compat winbind
>>>>>>> group: compat winbind
>>>>>>> shadow: compat
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hosts: files dns wins
>>>>>>> networks: files
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> protocols: db files
>>>>>>> services: db files
>>>>>>> ethers: db files
>>>>>>> rpc: db files
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> netgroup: nis
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# wbinfo -g
>>>>>>> Enterprise Read-Only Domain Controllers
>>>>>>> Domain Admins
>>>>>>> Domain Users
>>>>>>> Domain Guests
>>>>>>> Domain Computers
>>>>>>> Domain Controllers
>>>>>>> Schema Admins
>>>>>>> Enterprise Admins
>>>>>>> Group Policy Creator Owners
>>>>>>> Read-Only Domain Controllers
>>>>>>> DnsUpdateProxy
>>>>>>> Operations
>>>>>>> AV
>>>>>>> Graphics
>>>>>>> WAFA
>>>>>>> Finance
>>>>>>> Logos
>>>>>>> Streaming
>>>>>>> root at dc01:~# cat /etc/krb5.conf
>>>>>>> [libdefaults]
>>>>>>> default_realm = KIGM.LOCAL
>>>>>>> dns_lookup_realm = false
>>>>>>> dns_lookup_kdc = true
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the help. What about my suggestion to
>perform a normal
>>>>>>> install per the book and then move everything in
>>>>> /samba/var/lib to the
>>>>>>> correct location? Would that not work? I agree with you that
>>>>>>> this issue
>>>>>>> is caused by the odd install location.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
>and read the
>>>>>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>>>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>>
>>>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
More information about the samba
mailing list