[Samba] Wiki should have Readme First

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 19:31 +0100, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
> On 13.03.2014 08:12, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> > Am 12.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Klaus Hartnegg:
> >> Many first time users of Samba-4 seem to struggle with the same issues.
> >> I suggest the Wiki should have a Readme First
> 
> > I've added this 1:1 to the Wiki
> > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Readme_First
> > as a draft. It's currently not linked. I'll do this later, when it
> > contains more information.
> 
> I removed the section that claimed that the AD-server should not be used 
> as fileserver. This seems to be not the case any more in current versions.
> 
> What about the statement that backup is difficult and thus one should 
> run two DCs for replication? This is the section that I had expected to 
> be controversial, but nobody commented on this. How good is the existing 
> backup script?

A live DC is an important thing to have as well as an off-line backup.

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                       http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team  http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT          http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba