[Samba] Wiki should have Readme First

[Chan Min Wai]

Hi Kalus,

According to my understand. 

The developer are still not push this usage with AD DC. 

As they stated before samba 4 focus on AD DC functionality and some function may break. 

Also some missing function making using as files server a bit troublesome. 

Like wins server functionality not working. 
Possible performance affected by AD DC. 
CTDB missing. 

Running 2 AD DC with replication should always be the base design.
And the 3rd server as the file server or AD member (with winbind/nslcd/sssd and etc)

Some might think that this is too many redundancy. But you have start using AD DC and putting tons of authentication application to this AD DC. 

A fail single DC only meant trouble to everything. 

Hope this explain. 

Thank you. 



Regards, 
Chan Min Wai 

>> Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg at gmx.de> 於 23/03/2014 2:31 PG 寫道：
>> 
>> On 13.03.2014 08:12, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
>> Am 12.03.2014 23:56, schrieb Klaus Hartnegg:
>>> Many first time users of Samba-4 seem to struggle with the same issues.
>>> I suggest the Wiki should have a Readme First
> 
>> I've added this 1:1 to the Wiki
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Readme_First
>> as a draft. It's currently not linked. I'll do this later, when it
>> contains more information.
> 
> I removed the section that claimed that the AD-server should not be used as fileserver. This seems to be not the case any more in current versions.
> 
> What about the statement that backup is difficult and thus one should run two DCs for replication? This is the section that I had expected to be controversial, but nobody commented on this. How good is the existing backup script?
> 
> Klaus
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba