[Samba] [3.6.8] XP fails with error 1326
Rowland Penny
rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
Fri Oct 11 06:31:45 MDT 2013
On 11/10/13 13:10, Winfried wrote:
> Doesn't work on my host.
On my samba 3.6.3 server
> # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
> [global]
> workgroup = WORKGROUP
> encrypt passwords = yes
> log level = 2
> guest account = nobody
> security = user
> map to guest = Bad User
>
> [test]
> path = /tmp
> browsable = yes
> read only = yes
> guest ok = yes
AS above
> # pdbedit -L
> nobody:99:nobody
pdbedit -L
nobody:65534:nobody
Note: I never added user 'nobody'
>
> # smbpasswd -x nobody
> Deleted user nobody.
Did not do this
>
> # pdbedit -L
>
> # /etc/rc.d/rc.samba restart
Or the above
> # smbclient -L localhost -U%
> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.8]
>
> Sharename Type Comment
> --------- ---- -------
> Error returning browse list: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.8]
>
> Server Comment
> --------- -------
>
> Workgroup Master
> --------- -------
smbclient -L localhost -U%
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.3]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 3.6.3)
test Disk
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.6.3]
Server Comment
--------- -------
TESTCLIENT Samba 3.6.3
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
WORKGROUP TESTCLIENT
> # tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd
>
> [2013/10/11 14:20:50.229649, 2] smbd/reply.c:553(reply_special)
> netbios connect: name1=LOCALHOST 0x20 name2=SLAX 0x0
> [2013/10/11 14:20:50.231106, 2] smbd/reply.c:573(reply_special)
> netbios connect: local=localhost remote=slax, name type = 0
>
[2013/10/11 13:15:05.159362, 2] smbd/reply.c:553(reply_special)
netbios connect: name1=LOCALHOST 0x20 name2=TESTCLIENT 0x0
[2013/10/11 13:15:05.159504, 2] smbd/reply.c:573(reply_special)
netbios connect: local=localhost remote=testclient, name type = 0
It would seem that you do need the user 'nobody' but it also seems that
samba adds it automatically, what I do find strange is that on your
machine 'nobody' has the uidNumber of 99, whether this makes any
difference, I do not know.
I can only add that this setup works for me.
Rowland
More information about the samba
mailing list