[Samba] Should I forget sssd ?

[steve]

On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 17:06 +1100, me at electronico.nc wrote:
> Le 01/10/2013 16:44, steve a écrit :
> > Hi
> > It looks as though the ad backend is broken in 1.11.1. At least I can't
> > get it going with a similar sssd.conf:
> > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2013-September/016892.html
> >
> > I rolled back to 1.10.0 and it's fine.
> >
> > Re: your question.
> > If you can get away without having Linux clients in the domain, then
> > yes, you can forget sssd entirely.
> >
> > HTH and good luck,
> > Steve
> Ah !!!
> This makes sense to my life ( 
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2013-September/016892.html 
> ) !
> I was wondering if I won't go back to sheeps and cows ;-)
> Will try sssd 1.10.0 !
> (Yes Ubuntu host is actually the only Linux 'client' in the domain)
> Thanks again (posting 48 hours earlier would have save my soul during 
> this time)
> Nicolas

Hi
The bug in 1.11.1 has been fixed by the Red Hat guys:
[PATCH] AD: properly intitialize GC from ad_server option

---
 src/providers/ad/ad_common.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c b/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c
index 700ac03..ab62d64 100644
--- a/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c
+++ b/src/providers/ad/ad_common.c
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ _ad_servers_init(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
         }
         sdata->gc = true;
 
-        ret = be_fo_add_server(bectx, fo_service, list[i], 0, sdata,
primary);
+        ret = be_fo_add_server(bectx, fo_gc_service, list[i], 0, sdata,
primary);
         if (ret && ret != EEXIST) {
             DEBUG(SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE, ("Failed to add server\n"));
             goto done;
-- 
1.7.7.6

HTH
Steve