[Samba] samba4.1 RODC with BIND as DNS backend
Michael Brown
michael at netdirect.ca
Mon Nov 18 15:23:40 MST 2013
On 13-11-18 04:38 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
> I'm guessing that this may have to do with the fact that this is an RODC?
Looks like I'm probably right.
I just dcpromo'ed a Windows RODC into the environment and it didn't add
entries into gc._msdcs.
If I comment out:
#A gc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST} $IP
#AAAA gc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST} $IP
then it works, though I still get an error if I don't specify --all-names:
# samba_dnsupdate --all-names
Nov 18 17:21:53 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: starting transaction
on zone main.adlab.netdirect.ca
Nov 18 17:21:53 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: allowing update of
signer=SLES-SHIRE\$\@MAIN.ADLAB.NETDIRECT.CA
name=sles-shire.main.adlab.netdirect.ca tcpaddr=10.0.3.11 type=A
key=3713785057.sig-sles-shire.main.adlab.netdirect.ca/160/0
Nov 18 17:21:53 sles-shire named[6112]: client 10.0.3.11#36010/key
SLES-SHIRE\$\@MAIN.ADLAB.NETDIRECT.CA: updating zone
'main.adlab.netdirect.ca/NONE': adding an RR at
'sles-shire.main.adlab.netdirect.ca' A
Nov 18 17:21:53 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: committed transaction
on zone main.adlab.netdirect.ca
# samba_dnsupdate
Nov 18 17:22:21 sles-shire named[6112]: samba b9_putrr: unhandled record
type 0
What should I do about the b9_putrr error?
M.
--
Michael Brown | `One of the main causes of the fall of
Systems Consultant | the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero,
Net Direct Inc. | they had no way to indicate successful
☎: +1 519 883 1172 x5106 | termination of their C programs.' - Firth
More information about the samba
mailing list