[Samba] [PATCH] Re: fsmo _role_seize _issue

Marc Muehlfeld samba at marc-muehlfeld.de
Thu May 9 04:13:42 MDT 2013


Hello Andrew,

Am 09.05.2013 05:26, schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
> The attached patch should fix this for you.  As you might notice, the
> FSMO role transfer is successful, but we then error out.
>
> If I can get an ack from you that this solves your problem, and an ack
> from a team member on the patch, I can get this fixed in master and
> eventually into 4.0.6.


Thanks for the patch. I applied it to 4.0.5. Now errors are shown any 
more on transfers:



# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=rid
Attempting transfer...
FSMO transfer of 'rid' role successful
FSMO seize was not required, as transfer of 'rid' role was successful


# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=schema
Attempting transfer...
FSMO transfer of 'schema' role successful
FSMO seize was not required, as transfer of 'schema' role was successful


# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=naming
Attempting transfer...
FSMO transfer of 'naming' role successful
FSMO seize was not required, as transfer of 'naming' role was successful


# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=pdc
Attempting transfer...
FSMO transfer of 'pdc' role successful
FSMO seize was not required, as transfer of 'pdc' role was successful


# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=infrastructure
Attempting transfer...
FSMO transfer of 'infrastructure' role successful
FSMO seize was not required, as transfer of 'infrastructure' role was 
successful


[root at Test_DC2 local]# samba-tool fsmo show
InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS 
Settings,CN=TEST_DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=muc,DC=medizinische-genetik,DC=de
RidAllocationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS 
Settings,CN=TEST_DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=muc,DC=medizinische-genetik,DC=de
PdcEmulationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS 
Settings,CN=TEST_DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=muc,DC=medizinische-genetik,DC=de
DomainNamingMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS 
Settings,CN=TEST_DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=muc,DC=medizinische-genetik,DC=de
SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS 
Settings,CN=TEST_DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=muc,DC=medizinische-genetik,DC=de



Is there a way I can validate, that really everything is 100% fine, so I 
won't run into trouble after some days, when the old DC is away and 
caches/whatever on windows renews, etc?


What me confuses a bit on the 'fsmo seize' output was, that it first 
says, 'transferd successfull' and in the next line 'FSMO seize was not 
required, as transfer of 'infrastructure' role was successful'. What 
does it mean?



Regards,
Marc


More information about the samba mailing list