[Samba] [PATCH] Do not close winbind socket during use

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Thu Jun 27 04:54:56 MDT 2013

On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 11:42 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:39 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:26 +0000, Philippe.Simonet at swisscom.com wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew, and by putting more num-callers : 
> > > 
> > > valgrind --num-callers=50 samba -i -M single
> > 
> > Thanks for getting me that.  I've managed to reproduce it here, but not
> > under valgrind, and only when I hack the code to force a timeout.  At
> > least this should help me figure out why we process the winbind socket
> > close, which is the crux of this issue.
> I think I've found the cause of the issue you are hitting.  There is
> still another issue with the nested event loop in the krb5 libs, but
> these two patches should help significantly.
> As you have had more luck than I in reproducing this in a unaltered
> setting, please let me know if this helps.
> Patches are for git master, but may apply to 4.0 as well.

Actually, while they might apply to 4.0, the other changes I earlier in
the thread need to be applied first.   (They are already in master). 

> Kai, Metze:
> In reading the code, I cannot see why the DNS server would not suffer
> the same issue, if the DNS clients closed it's socket.  Should we find a
> more generic way to do this in service_stream, or should just duplicate
> this?  I don't think other servers hit the same issue as they are
> currently 'blocking' in terms of the socket handler. 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org

More information about the samba mailing list