[Samba] About NAS versus Samba
Scott Lovenberg
scott.lovenberg at gmail.com
Thu Jul 11 10:59:58 MDT 2013
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Fernando Lozano
<fernando at lozano.eti.br> wrote:
> But you know, everyone buys NASes today, it's getting harder to explaing a
> common PC would be better. Here a server box with a RAID controller and a
> hot-swappable disk bays is way more expensive than an iomega NAS in a rack
> form factory.
>
I've found the performance of those "cheap" NAS boxes (even the cheap
ones are relatively expensive) to be sub-par. Most of them max out at
a few MB/second. A reasonable set of hardware in a 2U with hot-swap
drives will absolutely smoke a cheap NAS and the price/performance
ratio is much better. Plus, you can use ZFS/BTRFS/etc as your backing
store if you'd like on your own dedicated box.
--
Peace and Blessings,
-Scott.
More information about the samba
mailing list