[Samba] Request to an old post - Having problem with Samba Internal DNS

Alex Matthews qoole.samba at lillimoth.com
Wed Feb 20 04:38:21 MST 2013


On 20/02/2013 10:58, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 10:53 +0000, Alex Matthews wrote:
>> Hiya,
>>
>> I am also having problems with this.
>>
>> When samba starts I get tsig verify failures:
>>
>> [2013/02/20 10:49:05,  0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:369(binary_smbd_main)
>>     samba version 4.0.3 started.
>>     Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2012
>> [2013/02/20 10:49:06,  0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:475(binary_smbd_main)
>>     samba: using 'standard' process model
>> [2013/02/20 10:49:07,  0]
>> ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
>>     /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
>> [2013/02/20 10:49:07,  0]
>> ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
>>     /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
>> [2013/02/20 10:49:07,  0]
>> ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
>>     /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
>> [2013/02/20 10:49:07,  0]
>> ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
>>     /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
>> [2013/02/20 10:49:07,  0]
>> ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:334(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
>>     /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure
>>
>> log level 3 = http://pastebin.com/ZJQR6hiJ
>>
>> Running dnsupdate shows it fails on the same records as above and
>> dnsupdate --all-names fails on _ALL_ records.
>>
>> Is this correct behaviour? (I can't see that being the case)
>> If not can someone suggest a way forward?
> This is a known issue, that produces this cosmetic error.  We have a
> patch to fix it, but want to add tests to ensure it does not regress
> again in the future.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Bartlett
>
Hiya,

Thanks for the response. So there are no known issues caused by this? It 
is 100% cosmetic as you put it?

I hope this clears things up for other people too!


Thanks,

Alex


More information about the samba mailing list