[Samba] Windows 7 attempting to access Samba over port 80
tbuchanan at vinu.edu
tbuchanan at vinu.edu
Tue May 29 12:20:27 MDT 2012
In my case -- same symptoms (attempted connection via TCP port 80), there
were over 200 6to4 adapters which I removed and then was able to connect
to samba share.
From: simo <idra at samba.org>
To: gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com,
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Date: 05/29/2012 02:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Windows 7 attempting to access Samba over port
Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org
IIRc I have seen Windows trying to use port 80 and webdav when no port
139/445 was available.
Only from the graphical shell though. This is not done at the redirector
level, but up the stack when the machine can't be found using SMB.
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 14:02 -0400, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> Since it is port 80, can you capture the contents of the packets?
> It might be Outlook trying to autoconfigure a mail account? Outlook
> will poke around on several ports trying to locate a mail server.
> I believe Windows clients should try to connect on port 445 then fall
> back to 137-139. The only way samba would use port 80 is if you were
> using an SSL tunnel BUT I don't think Windows client natively supports
> On 05/29/12 11:15, Tom Noonan II wrote:
> > Good Morning:
> > I'm running a domain-joined Samba 3.6 server. For the
> > users it is working as expected; they can log in without issue using
> > domain credentials and AD group ACLs are working. However, I have one
> > Windows 7 user who is complaining he can't log in. When I looked on
> > I see no logs for his machine. I did a initial traffic sniff and I
> > machine is pinging the Samba server on port 80.
> > I want to clearly state I don't think this is a samba
> > overall majority of users are not complaining about this server. Based
> > information I have today, Samba doesn't even come into play as the
> > pings the wrong port. I do still need to verify that the client is
> > initially on port 80, and not trying 445, failing, caching the
> > then falling back to 80 on subsequent attempts.
> > So, I want to pose the following question to the list:
has anyone seen
> > this? I shoulder surfed and I don't believe it to be user error at
> > I have a sit-down with the user tomorrow to try and resolve this.
> > currently believe this is a client side issue and I don't know what to
> > client side. (I'm a Linux admin, not Windows) Can any of the Windows
> > this list advise?
> > Thanks!
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
More information about the samba