[Samba] Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?
remus.dragos at gmail.com
Thu May 24 00:23:50 MDT 2012
Then POSIX ACLs are still the way to go for the moment, though ZFS ACL's
seems pretty robust.
Volker, may I ask what is the trend now: are people switching to ACEs now or
still stick with POSIX ?
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Volker Lendecke
<Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de>wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:12:02PM +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote:
> > Seems resonable, zfsacl stores the ACE's natively compared to acl_xattr
> > that makes
> > use of extended attributes.
> > It seems that the big players (Oracle, IBM) made their own tools.
> > Any idea of the strict mapping completeness among zfsacl and acl_xattr ?
> Closer than posix acls, but depending on your requirements
> still pretty bad for some aspects of ACLs. In particular
> inheritance based things are not covered properly, and chown
> operations have very different semantics.
> SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
> phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
> AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
> http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the samba