[Samba] Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?

[Pacher Dragos]

Thanks Jonathan,

I missed that.

So, zfsacl is provided by Oracle.

Should I favor acl_xattr besides zfsacl ?

Dragos

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan at buzzard.me.uk>wrote:

>
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:18 +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Setup is: Solaris 11 ZFS + Samba 3.5.10
> >
> > What is the recommended way nowadays of performing strict permissions
> > mapping between Samba and Windows NT 6.1 ?
> > And a more broader question: is it desirable ?
> >
> > As we know ZFS has native NFSv4 ACL's and this would mean that
> permissions
> > applied on Windows side should have an exact match
> > on the ZFS side.
> >
> > Is it acl_xattr module still needed ?
> >
> > Example:
> > [samba]
> >  path=/export/home/samba
> >  writable=yes
> >  vfs objects=acl_xattr
> >
> > By the way: acl_xattr is production ready now if I am not mistaken ?
> >
>
> I would imagine that you want to be using the vfs_zfsacl module if you
> are running on Solaris with ZFS. Note that NFSv4 ACL's don't exactly
> match Windows ACL's either, though they are a close match.
>
>
> JAB.
>
> --
> Jonathan A. Buzzard                 Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
> Fife, United Kingdom.
>
>
>