[Samba] Solaris 11 ZFS - acl_xattr still needed ?
remus.dragos at gmail.com
Tue May 22 03:34:44 MDT 2012
I missed that.
So, zfsacl is provided by Oracle.
Should I favor acl_xattr besides zfsacl ?
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Buzzard <jonathan at buzzard.me.uk>wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:18 +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote:
> > Dear list,
> > Setup is: Solaris 11 ZFS + Samba 3.5.10
> > What is the recommended way nowadays of performing strict permissions
> > mapping between Samba and Windows NT 6.1 ?
> > And a more broader question: is it desirable ?
> > As we know ZFS has native NFSv4 ACL's and this would mean that
> > applied on Windows side should have an exact match
> > on the ZFS side.
> > Is it acl_xattr module still needed ?
> > Example:
> > [samba]
> > path=/export/home/samba
> > writable=yes
> > vfs objects=acl_xattr
> > By the way: acl_xattr is production ready now if I am not mistaken ?
> I would imagine that you want to be using the vfs_zfsacl module if you
> are running on Solaris with ZFS. Note that NFSv4 ACL's don't exactly
> match Windows ACL's either, though they are a close match.
> Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk
> Fife, United Kingdom.
More information about the samba