[Samba] Franky vs s3fs vs ...
steve at steve-ss.com
Wed May 9 00:50:25 MDT 2012
On 05/09/2012 12:12 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 19:05 +0200, steve wrote:
>> On 08/05/12 14:11, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 11:39 +0200, steve wrote:
>>>> On 05/08/2012 10:19 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 08:45 +0200, steve wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/08/2012 06:24 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:27 +0200, steve wrote:
>>> This will only happen if you do not have the acl headers available at
>>> configure time. Install libacl-devel (or equivalent) and rebuild.
>>> I added exactly this check to ensure that you quickly find and fix this
>>> issue, rather than wasting time wondering 'why does this not work'.
>> Thanks. libacl1-dev got us there: Ubuntu LTS
>> It's much more predictable than ntvfs but:
>> A share set up 0750 root:staff can be entered by anyone, staff group
>> member or not. A file 0660 root staff is not accessible by a staff
>> member. Ahhgghh!!
>> The same share via nfs to Linux works as expected.
>> Maybe this is still too early to test?
> My understanding is that we honour any ACL set by the NTVFS server
> first, but that of course the NTVFS server didn't set posix ACLs to
> match. If you change it via the Windows GUI, it should change both
> As to a share 0660 - indeed, no user/group should be able to enter that
> directory, as no user/group (except the owner, by override rights) has
> the right to enter it.
> Andrew Bartlett
I'm not sure that's correct. As I understand, a file with 0660 should
have group rw. However, under xp and win7 the same file gets 'Access is
denied' for group members. Also, a 0750 share should allow only group
members to enter. Under windows, anyone can enter, group member or not.
Does s3fs understand Linux permissions right now?
Can I control access using s3fs?
More information about the samba