[Samba] Franky vs s3fs vs ...
steve at steve-ss.com
Tue May 8 03:39:59 MDT 2012
On 05/08/2012 10:19 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 08:45 +0200, steve wrote:
>> On 05/08/2012 06:24 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:27 +0200, steve wrote:
>>>> We don't use winbind either and we also use nslcd (what a superb piece
>>>> of kit). We simply store the rfc2307 attributes in the dn of the user or
>>>> group and have setup scripts to manipulate uses and groups in this way.
>>>> All I'm looking for is an altrernative to the file sever that ships with
>>>> S4 at the moment. I think the new fileserver will become stable soon.
>>>> Just looking at the possibilites for having something now rather than
>>>> wait. Franky on the same box is attractive.
>>> Attempting to run Franky at this point will give you more, not less
>>> pain. There isn't some magic solution that we are hiding from you.
>>> We are working to allow smbd to become the default file server in Samba
>>> 4.0, and have added the --use-s3fs option to provision to allow early
>>> adopters to test it for us.
>>> However, we do not recommend it at this stage, as in particular it fails
>>> to correctly set ACLs for group policy objects.
>> Hi Andrew
>> Please give us the smb.conf settings for s3fs. We can't continue with
>> the ntvfs server as it is so at least we can give it a go.
> I've added this information to the wiki, where I'll try and keep it
> Andrew Bartlett
New git: Version 4.0.0alpha21-GIT-e8e5afd on Ubuntu 12.04
provision --use-s3fs --realm=polop.site --domain=CACTUS
--adminpass=Pass at w0rd --server-role=dc
get_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned zero.
ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs,
s3fs is unworkable in this mode
Still will not provision.
We are using posix acls fine:
/dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro,acl,user_xattr)
What have I done wrong?
More information about the samba