[Samba] Samba 4 provisioning error on Ubuntu 12.04
rpenny at f2s.com
Thu Jun 21 05:30:54 MDT 2012
On 21/06/12 10:16, steve wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 10:24 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 21/06/12 07:42, steve wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2012 08:27 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 14:17 -0700, todd kman wrote:
>>>> Let's start from the top: - Is libacl-dev1 installed on your system?
>>> ** I think that should be:
>>> Here is the fstab entry on a working 12.04:
>>> UUID=f99d4f08-6123-4941-8ee2-a260d22ddce5 / ext4
>>> errors=remount-ro,acl,user_xattr 0 1
>> Hmm, this is interesting, this is what I have in my /etc/fstab on
>> Ubuntu 12.04 server
>> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
>> # / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
>> UUID=63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 / ext4
>> errors=remount-ro 0 1
>> # /home was on /dev/sda6 during installation
>> UUID=3826e336-978b-43e6-b02f-83694b132ed3 /home ext4
>> defaults 0 2
>> cat /proc/mounts
>> /dev/disk/by-uuid/63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 / ext4
>> rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
>> /dev/sda6 /home ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
>> This passes the acl test on
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO even though acl is not
>> mentioned (it is installed) and Samba4 from git compiles and installs
>> Do I need to add acl to my /etc/fstab lines? user_xattr seems to be a
>> default setting.
> Hi Rowland
> My Samba4 is installed at /usr/local/bin on the / partition of the
> disk so I added acl,user_xattr to the / line in fstab and rebuilt with
> libacl1-dev installed, having read a post on the Ubuntu forum. Before
> this, I had the same s3fs error when provisioning.
> /proc/mounts here gives the same output as yours so It looks as if the
> acl parameter is not needed, but no harm in trying. Are you able to
> reboot if you change fstab? If my memory server me correctly,
> remounting didn't work.
> Sorry can't be more positive.
Well, I could try adding acl to the relevant /etc/fstab lines but as I
said Samba4 compiled, installed & provisioned without complaining about
it being missing. The acl test from the howto was passed on the relevant
partitions, so I am wondering if I do need to alter my /etc/fstab.
Is there anybody out there, with more knowledge than me, who can confirm
one way or the other?
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the samba