[Samba] Samba 4 provisioning error on Ubuntu 12.04

[Rowland Penny]

On 21/06/12 10:16, steve wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 10:24 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 21/06/12 07:42, steve wrote:
>>> On 06/21/2012 08:27 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 14:17 -0700, todd kman wrote:
>>>> Let's start from the top: - Is libacl-dev1 installed on your system?
>>> ** I think that should be:
>>> libacl1-dev
>>>
>>> Here is the fstab entry on a working 12.04:
>>> UUID=f99d4f08-6123-4941-8ee2-a260d22ddce5 / ext4 
>>> errors=remount-ro,acl,user_xattr 0 1
>>>
>>> HTH
>>> Steve
>>>
>> Hmm, this is interesting, this is what I have in my /etc/fstab on 
>> Ubuntu 12.04 server
>>
>> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
>> # / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
>> UUID=63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 /               ext4    
>> errors=remount-ro 0       1
>> # /home was on /dev/sda6 during installation
>> UUID=3826e336-978b-43e6-b02f-83694b132ed3 /home           ext4    
>> defaults        0       2
>>
>> cat /proc/mounts
>> Shows:
>> /dev/disk/by-uuid/63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 / ext4 
>> rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
>> /dev/sda6 /home ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
>>
>> This passes the acl test on 
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO even though acl is not 
>> mentioned (it is installed) and Samba4 from git compiles and installs 
>> ok.
>> Do I need to add acl to my /etc/fstab lines? user_xattr seems to be a 
>> default setting.
>>
>> Rowland
>>
>>
> Hi Rowland
> My Samba4 is installed at /usr/local/bin on the / partition of the 
> disk so I added acl,user_xattr to the / line in fstab and rebuilt with 
> libacl1-dev installed, having read a post on the Ubuntu forum. Before 
> this, I had the same s3fs error when provisioning.
>
> /proc/mounts here gives the same output as yours so It looks as if the 
> acl parameter is not needed, but no harm in trying. Are you able to 
> reboot if you change fstab? If my memory server me correctly, 
> remounting didn't work.
>
> Sorry can't be more positive.
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
Well, I could try adding acl to the relevant /etc/fstab lines but as I 
said Samba4 compiled, installed & provisioned without complaining about 
it being missing. The acl test from the howto was passed on the relevant 
partitions, so I am wondering if I do need to alter my /etc/fstab.
Is there anybody out there, with more knowledge than me, who can confirm 
one way or the other?

Rowland

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.