[Samba] Samba Permissions
Baird, Josh
jbaird at follett.com
Sun Dec 9 14:16:57 MST 2012
Sorry for the top post.
If I only wanted to use ACLs to control access, and not Samba as indicated in my OP, should I use "security = share" mode?
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: TAKAHASHI Motonobu [mailto:monyo at monyo.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 2:20 AM
To: Baird, Josh
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Permissions
From: "Baird, Josh" <jbaird at follett.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 20:58:22 +0000
> I thought I had this working correctly, but sometimes it randomly breaks.
> Here is an example of a share's configuration:
>
> [testshare]
> comment = Test Share
> path = /test/testshare
> writeable = yes
> create mask = 770
> directory mask = 770
You may want to add "force group = DOMAIN\testgroup".
> if the share's directory has the following permissions:
>
> drwxrwx--- 2 root DOMAIN\testgroup 4096 Dec 7 14:54 testshare
>
> Then, anyone in the "DOMAIN\testgroup" should have read/write access
> to the share, correct?
Basically yes. In my env, those settings work correctly.
DOMAIN\testuser, a member of DOMAIN\testgroup can write to the share. The owner group of written file is "DOMAIN\domain users", testuser's primary group.
---
TAKAHASHI Motononu <monyo at monyo.com>
More information about the samba
mailing list