[Samba] s3fs proposal
steve at steve-ss.com
Sun Apr 29 03:36:07 MDT 2012
On 29/04/12 09:09, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 12:31 +0200, steve wrote:
>> How about calling s3fs, s4fs?
> The 's3fs' proposal you refer to is documented at
> In terms of a codename s4fs, that would imply a DC based on the ntvfs
> file server, which is what we have agreed to change to be the
> non-default option.
> I hope this clarifies things,
Hi Andrew, hi everyone.
Thanks. That clarifies a lot. As the only English speaking member of our
team it is difficult to explain this stuff. The locals here seem to want
new stuff, if only by name.
More information about the samba