[Samba] Advice for W2K migration to samba
mromani at ottotecnica.com
Fri Mar 4 02:47:51 MST 2011
Il 04/03/2011 05:43, Andrew Bartlett ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 09:17 +0100, Marcello Romani wrote:
>> I'm running a W2K AD network with about 20 clients (mostly Windows
>> XP machines, some Ubuntu 10.04 clients). I also have a couple of samba
>> servers (debian 5) which are joined to the domain.
>> I need to upgrade from W2K to something which is not EOL.
>> The AD server is also a print server for the domain.
>> I only have about 20 user accounts, so recreating them from scratch
>> would be not a big problem.
>> Also, the user profiles are not stored on the server (no roaming profiles).
>> I read samba4 is still in alpha stage (alpha14 is listed on the wiki),
>> but in terms of functionality provided is would the best replacement for
>> my AD server.
>> I would be glad to hear from someone who has done the switch from W2K AD
>> to samba3 or samba4. Also, any advice or success/failure stories in
>> similar setups would be great.
>> Thanks in advance.
> This (Windows 2000 -> Samba4) certainly has been made to work, multiple
> times. Those successful migrations that I know of were via Windows 2003
> due to an odd Kerberos interop issue between Samba4 and Windows 2000.
> Andrew Bartlett
thanks for your response. Now that you mention it, I remember
having read something about the need to pass through 2K3 to land on
samba4. I'll investigate that detail (obviously I'd prefer to avoid
setting up a 2K3 server just to migrate...)
Would you then recommend going to samba4 instead of the (apparently)
more stable samba3 (samba4 being alpha as of today ?).
More information about the samba