[Samba] Fwd: removing windows 2003 from samba4&In-Reply-To=<4DEDC91A.3080706 at samba.org>

[Alan Morais]

2011/6/18 Matthieu Patou <mat at samba.org>

>
> Better try this:
> ./bin/samba-tool fsmo show --url=ldap://127.0.0.1 -U administrator
>
> Nice :-)

root at samba4lab:~# /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool fsmo show --url=ldap://
127.0.0.1 -U administrator
Password for [SAMBA4\administrator]:
InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=SAMBA4LAB,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba4,DC=casa
RidAllocationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=SAMBA4LAB,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba4,DC=casa
PdcEmulationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=SAMBA4LAB,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba4,DC=casa
DomainNamingMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=SAMBA4LAB,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba4,DC=casa
SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=SAMBA4LAB,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=samba4,DC=casa


> You say windows 2003 is it 2003 or 2003r2 ? We mostly test Windows 2003r2,
> Windows 2008 and Windows 2008r2. So we might have some corner cases still
> with Windows 2003 (we had last year with samba joining a Windows 2003 DC
> domain).
>
> Once I have your answer I'll try to setup a domain join samba, seize roles
> and try to dcpromo /remove on Windows. It might not be the best idea when
> the other DCs is saying that it wants to leave the domain to try to keep it
> informed about changes ...
>
> If you are in hurry and you transferred all the roles to samba you can
> safely remove the DC by removing the entry in Domain controllers + the
> Server entries in the Configuration naming context, but there isn't much
> interests do it as it will still leave some attributes. This issue should be
> solved soon as we have a couple of patchs waiting in the queue for this but
> for the moment they are not there ...
>
> Matthieu


I'm using win 2003, so R2 is more recommended to work with Samba4? ( makes
sense, compatibility issues, even M$ products have this :P )

i will setup a 2003r2 Box to continue running tests( another DC), and wait
for those patchs ( no hurry for that )