[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain
Damien Dye
damien.j.dye at googlemail.com
Sat May 1 11:09:12 MDT 2010
humm
cn: workstation75$
description: Computer
gecos: Computer
gidNumber: 515
homeDirectory: /dev/null
loginShell: /bin/false
objectClass: top, account, posixAccount
uid: workstation75$
uidNumber: 1068
looks like the samba account has not been created only the unix account.
does the join work if you have a samba account for the machine defined first ?
--
Damien Dye BSC(hon)
On 30 April 2010 01:10, Michael Leonetti <mleonetti at evolutionce.com> wrote:
> Using LDAP and the smbldap-tools. When attempting to join the domain with an administrative user, the computer gets added to the Computers list in LDAP with the following attributes:
>
>
> cn: workstation75$
> description: Computer
> gecos: Computer
> gidNumber: 515
> homeDirectory: /dev/null
> loginShell: /bin/false
> objectClass: top, account, posixAccount
> uid: workstation75$
> uidNumber: 1068
>
> Then the workstation displays this message:
>
> "the following error occurred attempting to join the domain "falm"
>
> the user name could not be found"
>
> Then the workstation log outputs this at log level 3
>
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724539, 3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
> Transaction 0 of length 137 (0 toread)
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724570, 3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
> switch message SMBnegprot (pid 1986) conn 0x0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724593, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724661, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724679, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724692, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724706, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> Requested protocol [LM1.2X002]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724724, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724742, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724846, 3] smbd/negprot.c:404(reply_nt1)
> using SPNEGO
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724862, 3] smbd/negprot.c:691(reply_negprot)
> Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736749, 3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
> Transaction 1 of length 240 (0 toread)
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736799, 3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
> switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736880, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736930, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1435(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
> wct=12 flg2=0xc807
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736952, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1390(setup_new_vc_session)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources.
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737021, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1189(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> Doing spnego session setup
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737086, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1231(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737157, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:805(reply_spnego_negotiate)
> reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 40
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737254, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:65(debug_ntlmssp_flags)
> Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738057, 3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
> Transaction 2 of length 358 (0 toread)
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738121, 3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
> switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738185, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738244, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1435(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
> wct=12 flg2=0xc807
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738285, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1390(setup_new_vc_session)
> setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources.
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738337, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1189(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> Doing spnego session setup
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738396, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1231(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738471, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:747(ntlmssp_server_auth)
> Got user=[administrator] domain=[falm] workstation=[WORKSTATION75] len1=24 len2=24
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738557, 3] auth/auth.c:216(check_ntlm_password)
> check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [falm]\[administrator]@[WORKSTATION75] with the new password interface
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738622, 3] auth/auth.c:219(check_ntlm_password)
> check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [falm]\[administrator]@[WORKSTATION75]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738687, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738728, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738771, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738960, 2] lib/smbldap.c:950(smbldap_open_connection)
> smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.739601, 3] lib/smbldap.c:1166(smbldap_connect_system)
> ldap_connect_system: successful connection to the LDAP server
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740038, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:572(init_sam_from_ldap)
> init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: administrator
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740168, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740211, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740252, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740344, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740469, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740508, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740548, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740809, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.741718, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.741765, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.741803, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742113, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
> init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742196, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742255, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742299, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742347, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742393, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742434, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742480, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743163, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
> init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743221, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743269, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743309, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743347, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743395, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743444, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743512, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743550, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743590, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743649, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743708, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743830, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743868, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743907, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743968, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.744004, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.744044, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.744079, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.746497, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.746517, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.746538, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.747055, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
> init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512
>
> The problem is the log doesn't give me any information on what's going on and this happened out of nowhere. Any help would really be appreciated.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
More information about the samba
mailing list