[Samba] Problem After Upgrade - NT_STATUS_FILE_IS_A_DIRECTORY
itmanager at alexanderconsultants.net
Wed Jul 7 13:51:58 MDT 2010
> Is this a *real* RAID controller or a 'fake' (BIOS/Software/MB) RAID
> controller? If it is a real controller are you sure there is no Linux
> driver for it? (Esp. since you are using Ubuntu!) If it is a
> software/BIOS/MB RAID controller the performance is going to be really
> bad -- these controllers are really only meant for home systems and not
> really for true servers.
This is an Addonics controller card that uses Silicon
Image 3124 chip. We have a RAID tower housing 12 hard
>> I'd have to setup mdadm on Ubuntu, which I've done
>> before and was not impressed. The Windows RAID system
>> we have is much more easier to maintain.
> Oh, you mean you have to actually use your keyboard? How dreadfull...
Not really. The GUI-based software for this controller
card provides a lot of configuration options and
documentation, something that is not so intuitive in
mdadm. Its not just about using a dreadful keyboard,
> Do you mean to say that the files local to the Ubuntu *server* are not on
> a RAID array?
No. They are not as important and the data can be
quickly restored from backups.
> This sort of 'game' (mounting files from one 'server' on another server
> and then re-exporting them), is not *specific* to Samba. See what
> happens when you try to NFS export file systems mounted as nfs file
> systems (although I expect nfsd/mountd would refuse to let you do that
> in the first place).
> There are several problems:
> It tends to confuse the server(s). File serving software (Samba, NFSD,
> etc.) really expect the data they are serving to be local (yes, using a
> NAS or something like that is a little different) and are written to
> optimal to work that way.
> It causes lots of network traffic: every I/O operation causes two
> batches of network traffic and implies two sets of network channels: one
> set between the machine with the physical disks (the XP box) and the
> 'server' (the Ubuntu box), and a *second* set of network channels
> between the 'server' (the Ubuntu box) and the final client(s) (the
> client MS-Windows machine(s)). If this is on one physical network (if
> the 'server' (the Ubuntu box) only has one NIC), then the you have lots
> of network collisions, which means your network thoughput will truely
> suck (eg network timeouts, dropped/lost packets, etc.).
> I expect that 'before' you 'got by' by luck. What might be happening
> now is that some fix to Samba is biting you or maybe you are getting
> network I/O errors (timeouts?) because of what I described in the
> paragraph above.
> What you are doing is not really going to work in the long term. You
> either need to:
> 1) Buy a real, supported RAID card for the Ubuntu system.
> 2) Live with mdadm
> 3) Pay for licenses for the XP system.
I agree with this and will probably have to begin
doing one of the above. I was just hoping someone
would know an exact cause and fix for my situation
without having to redo infrastructure.
Thanks for your comments.
More information about the samba