[Samba] Feedback to getting to samba 4 blog
presgas at gmail.com
Fri Jan 15 08:44:49 MST 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:38 +0100
> From: Guillaume Rousse <Guillaume.Rousse at inria.fr>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Feedback to getting to samba 4 blog
> Le 14/01/2010 15:07, Andreas Moroder a écrit :
>> I did not find a way tu put my opinion to the blog so I answer here. I
>> hope this is ok.
>> We ( a public hospital ) are one of the few that have no AD, because I
>> wanted to wait that samba has this functionality.
>> Every solution that give us the stability of samba and also AD is ok for
>> us, but please this year, otherwise I will be force to start with MS AD.
> You can use AD, while still delegating autentication to a unix-based kerberos
> realm. And use samba for print and file services.
I can confirm that our environment was set up this way and worked. One
thing you will have to google if you go to AD with unix kerberos is "Cross
I will also say that we consolidated our Kerberos KCD to just using the AD
servers as KDCs. With some hickups, it works passably.
- ---Robert Freeman-Day
I would really like you to be on my side,
but the side you show me isn't what I had in mind.
GPG Public Key:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba