[Samba] Given up on Fedora Ubuntu is 1000-folder simpler

Eero Volotinen eero.volotinen at iki.fi
Fri Jan 15 01:02:32 MST 2010

Quoting Natxo Asenjo <natxo.asenjo at gmail.com>:

> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Peter Olcott <peteolcott at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I spent several days (at least 20 hours) tying to get Fedora 11 Samba server
>> going. I consulted every resource that I knew including this list. When I
>> discovered that Fedora 11 Samba could be browsed immediately upon
>> installation, and a simple reboot disabled this, I gave up. I decided to try
>> Ubuntu. After intallation it took only five minutes of editing the smb.conf
>> file to make my share fully operational. In terms of total cost of ownership
>> Fedora and Red Hat have become big losers.
> while distro wars are kind of funny, I would rather you specified what
> went wrong than just troll about Fedora. There are lots of people
> using samba and fedora without any hassle at all.
> At the end of the day, it's just about editing a text file, smb.conf
> on both platforms.

Fedora is now shipping selinux enabled by default?

Just need to turn it off or know how to configure it :)


More information about the samba mailing list