[Samba] Reverse Veto Files - let's try again!
jra at samba.org
Wed Jul 29 12:27:23 MDT 2009
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:40:28AM +0100, Illtud Daniel wrote:
> Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> It's doable, but I wouldn't use that syntax. I'd
>> use an "allowed files = /XXX/" style.
> That's what I was thinking, but the question started
> off as 'does veto files take !', so that's where my
> convoluted syntax example came from.
>> Not been implemented yet.... Patch welcome :-).
> I've barely touched C since before I started using samba
> (and that's 15 years ago...) but if you insist, I'll
> cludge something together in a week that'll take somebody
> else five minutes to completely rewrite... :)
Thanks -but at least you'll give me something to work on :-).
> Any preference for precedence of 'allowed files' vs 'veto files'?
> Or would you want an apache-style 'Order allowed veto' option?
> (please say no).
veto files should take precedence.
More information about the samba