[Samba] VFS recycle & force user
Lukas Deseyve
deseyve at linuxbox.cz
Mon Jul 13 12:06:42 GMT 2009
Hi,
i tried Samba 3.4.0 but with same result:(
I created a new bug #6549 where i put also my log file with debug
level 10
Lukas
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:47:31PM +0200, deseyve at linuxbox.cz wrote:
>
>> i have problem with share with parametr "force user"
>>
>> Here i my settings of VFS modul recycle
>>
>> vfs object = recycle
>> recycle:repository = .recycle/%u
>> recycle:maxsize = 50000000
>> recycle:exclude = *.tmp *.temp *.o *.obj ~$*
>> recycle:exclude_dir = sdileni/*/profile* tmp temp cache
>> recycle:versions = yes
>> recycle:touch = yes
>> recycle:keeptree = yes
>>
>> and this is my share
>>
>> [my_share]
>> path = /home/sdileni/instalace
>> comment = software, instalace
>> force group = smbgroup
>> force user = smbuser
>> public = yes
>>
>>
>> If i delete some file from this share, then samba make
>> directory .recycle/smbuser. But in older version (for example Samba 3.3.0)
>> samba maked directory .recycle/real_user - and this i need! It's possible?
>> I must have something new in configuration or is this new behavior of
>> samba?
>
> I think this is a side effect of the change that went
> into 3.4.0pre1. From the changelog :
>
> Changes since 3.4.0pre1
> -----------------------
>
> o Jeremy Allison
> * BUG 6291: Fix 'force user'.
>
> The recycle code uses a substitution of conn->server_info->unix_name
> for the "%u" parameter, and this is not (correctly) set to the
> forced username on connect (which is required for "force user"
> to work correctly.
>
> The real user name is lost after authentication, which is what
> you've asked for. The previous (3.3.0) behavior was probably a
> side effect of force user not being correct in that release.
>
> I think in the latest Samba 3.3.6 it would behave the same.
>
> Jeremy.
>
>
More information about the samba
mailing list