[Samba] Samba performance issue
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Jan 6 19:25:02 GMT 2009
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:41:55AM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
> > > Why do cifs and smbfs not have this capability? Is it too much work? Is
> > > it due to differences in the purpose of each?
> > It's fiddly work nobody has done yet.
> fiddly = not hard work, but tedious and sort of annoying?
Fiddly as in not many of lines of code, but code with
complex interactions and data dependencies. So I'd say for
me it is hard work, others might find it easier. But as
nobody has done it yet, I'd say I'm not completely alone in
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20090106/087f176f/attachment.bin
More information about the samba