[Samba] Veto files question

[Allen Chen]

Andrew Masterson wrote:
> Turning it on its head then, set ACLS for the full read-write share, and
> set the local perms to 700.  Then set the flags on the original mount to
> honour acls, and the flags on the second mount to *not* honour acls.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^    
>   
It does make sense. but How do you set up "honour acls" in smb.conf?
I use Samba 3.0.22.

> Then set hide unreadable=yes for the second mount.
>
> Maybe the "nt acl support" option will help.  Maybe a different way to
> approach the problem. YMMV
>
> -=Andrew
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allen Chen [mailto:achen at harbourfrontcentre.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:40 AM
> To: Andrew Masterson
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Veto files question
>
> Andrew Masterson wrote:
>   
>> hide unreadable = yes
>>
>> is the closest I can think of.  You could then set perms to something
>> like 400 and only owners will be able to read their own files.
>>
>> -=Andrew
>>
>>   
>>     
> Thank you, Andrew.
> Changing the perms is not the solution. This is what I want to do:
> I have a public share. Everybody can read,write and modify files within 
> this share. This works perfect.
> * I want to create another 'share' in smb.conf pointing to the same
> folder.
> * When a user mounts this share, he will only see the files belongs to
> his.
> I think Samba should have the power to filter it. Any idea?
>
> Allen
>
>