[Samba] Veto files question

[Andrew Masterson]

Turning it on its head then, set ACLS for the full read-write share, and
set the local perms to 700.  Then set the flags on the original mount to
honour acls, and the flags on the second mount to *not* honour acls.

Then set hide unreadable=yes for the second mount.

Maybe the "nt acl support" option will help.  Maybe a different way to
approach the problem. YMMV

-=Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Chen [mailto:achen at harbourfrontcentre.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:40 AM
To: Andrew Masterson
Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Veto files question

Andrew Masterson wrote:
> hide unreadable = yes
>
> is the closest I can think of.  You could then set perms to something
> like 400 and only owners will be able to read their own files.
>
> -=Andrew
>
>   
Thank you, Andrew.
Changing the perms is not the solution. This is what I want to do:
I have a public share. Everybody can read,write and modify files within 
this share. This works perfect.
* I want to create another 'share' in smb.conf pointing to the same
folder.
* When a user mounts this share, he will only see the files belongs to
his.
I think Samba should have the power to filter it. Any idea?

Allen