[Samba] Solaris nss_ldap vs PADL nss_ldap

[albanperso-zatoo at yahoo.com]

Hi Duncan,

I have the same issue on Solaris and Samba (3.028a and 3.31) that is OK for primary groups but not for secondaries.

can you describe how do you get / configurePADL's nss_ldap?

Thanks in advance

Regards

Alban


----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Duncan Brannen <dbb at st-andrews.ac.uk>
> À : samba at lists.samba.org
> Envoyé le : Mercredi, 27 Août 2008, 18h09mn 55s
> Objet : [Samba] Solaris nss_ldap vs PADL nss_ldap
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All,
>           Any thoughts on why, while everything seems ok at the OS level 
> (getent , id -a ) Samba
> doesn't pickup any supplementary groups when Solaris is configured with 
> 'group: files ldap' in
> nsswitch.conf and using it's own native nss_ldap.so.1 but does when 
> using PADL's nss_ldap?
> Everything else is equal.
> 
> Do they use/accept different calls or could it be an openldap vs native 
> ldap incompatibility,
> Samba being compiled against the openldap libraries.
> 
> Samba seems not to compile against the native libraries due to a lack of 
> ldap_start_tls_s
> 
> Solaris 10 and Samba 3.2.2
> 
> Cheers,
>           Duncan
> 
> -- 
> The University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland : No SC013532
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba