[Samba] Re: cifs verses smbfs for Linux clients

[Volker Lendecke]

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:56:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Is this a problem practically, or is it a matter of the Samba Team's
> licensing policy?
> 
> As this is a stand-alone shell script, I wouldn't expect there to be any
> license compatibility issues; but if it's a requirement that even shell
> scripts be GPLv3 to ship with Samba, I'll concede "GPLv2 or greater".

Well, it's not a strict requirement. But we would like it to
be as consistent as possible.

What do others think? Can we replace smbmount with such a
wrapper for 3.2? Jeremy? Jerry?

Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20080220/4ef5d359/attachment.bin