[Samba] Slower performance on oplock
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Sat Feb 16 07:39:52 GMT 2008
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:33:38AM +0000, Li, Ying (ESG) wrote:
> - Whether IS the defer_open on the second open necessary?
> Because this is the same process, and the same file.
> - What kind of reasons to cause the smbd did not receive the break msg?
No idea. A signal sometimes not delivered? Does the message
end up in messages.tdb? As this is a message to the process
itself, you could implement a shortcut in messages.c if
signals on HP/UX are unreliable. But this will not help
with oplocks to other processes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20080216/38569bb6/attachment.bin
More information about the samba