[Samba] Samba 3.2.0 in Debian "lenny"
Daniel L. Miller
dmiller at amfes.com
Tue Aug 5 18:51:48 GMT 2008
Jason A. Nunnelley wrote:
>> I'm probably wrong (I usually am) - but my understanding is if there
>> is a problem with a released package, and the distro team doesn't
>> want to upgrade to a new upstream version, the responsibility for
>> repairing those problems lies with the packagers. Based on the
>> release notes I just saw on 3.2.1 - all I saw were bugfixes, not
>> feature additions. That should be reason enough to pull it in to Lenny.
>
>
> Are we talking about what makes it into the next release of the OS
> distro, or what makes it into the apt-get repository?
>
I'm not understanding the distinction - unless you're referring to
non-official apt sources. For me, as a someone who knows enough to get
into REAL trouble...I love packages and avoid source-based installs
whenever possible.
From the standpoint of wanting Debian to continue to be a trusted,
stable platform - if the Samba team says 3.2.1 is a very important fix
to 3.2.0, I'd hope the Debian team approves it. If 3.2.0 is buggy - it
will result in users blaming Debian when their long-running Samba
servers start having issues. It would be one thing if a really cool
feature was left out - and now implemented. It's something else when
there is are known problems - and a fix is now available that adds no
functionality (it doesn't, right?).
From the standpoint of a *slightly* more educated user, if there's an
unofficial repository I can reach out to for an updated version, and
it's compatible with the distro's outdated version - that gets me
functional.
--
Daniel
More information about the samba
mailing list