[Samba] ACL strange behaviour

[toni]

El Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:04:21 +0200
Carlos Lorenzo Matés <clmates at mundo-r.com> ha escrit:

> Hi Toni.
> 
> 
> El Viernes, 4 de Abril de 2008, toni escribió:
> > hi john,
> >
> > El Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:12:38 -0400
> >
> > John Drescher <drescherjm at gmail.com> ha escrit:
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:39 AM, toni <tonign at xtec.net> wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> > > >  i'm experiencing a strange behaviour when setting ACL from
> > > > Windows XP clients (server is BDC with LDAP) after migrating
> > > > service from SLES 9.3 to SLES 10.1:
> > > >
> > > >  i can't set ACL to a folder to give access to individual users
> > > > without allowing the group of the creator. step by step, i
> > > > tried to remove group permissions (which worked fine) but, when
> > > > i add permissions to other users, group permissions become
> > > > effective for the group in the directory (but no in its
> > > > subfolders)
> > > >
> > > >  the correct behaviour is that i can allow access to several
> > > > users without access for the group, and this was working after
> > > > the migration.
> > > >
> > > >  it could be a different ACL behaviour between SLES 9 (Samba
> > > >  3.0.20b-3.17-1297-SUSE) and SLES 10 (Samba
> > > > 3.0.28-0.2-1625-SUSE-CODE10)?
> > > >
> 
> 
> We had the same problems, finally we have downgrade our samba to
> 3.0.24 wich is SLES 10 + SP1 base version.

verified, it works with 3.0.24!
(SLES 10 + SP1, with codename: Samba 3.0.24-2.36-1616-SUSE-CODE10)

do you know if this issue were reported to samba, i cannot find any ACL
related bug in samba's bugtracker.

if not i will fill a bug report.

thanks for all,

toni

> 
> I had tested with 3.0.25 and 3.0.28 and had problems, also with
> domain trust with an NT domain
> 
> 
> Greetings
>