[Samba] force group to Unix group in 3.0.25

Gerald (Jerry) Carter jerry at samba.org
Fri May 18 15:35:48 GMT 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

seowphm at starhub.net.sg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm currently using v3.0.24 in production and all works well.
> I'm testing 3.0.25 to see if I'm going to have any problems with it if 
> I have to upgrade. I have a problem with the "force group" setting if
> it is set to a local Unix group. This same setting works fine in
> 3.0.24 but I'm denied access to the same share
> in 3.0.25.  If I comment off the "force group" line in 3.0.25, I can 
> access the share fine.  It also works if I set the "force group"
> setting to a domain group.  It only fails with a local Unix group.
> Any pointers to what I can try to resolve this in 3.0.25 ?

Our bug.  I fixed it last night for next week's 3.0.25a release
(http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Release_Planning_for_Samba_3.0).

You can either retest against the SAMBA_3_0_25 svn tree or I
can send you a patch.





cheers, jerry



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGTcfUIR7qMdg1EfYRAiBCAJ9UlrdQYcMn45nOj2qSAtwNU7hVugCgy5gy
p0RdUHw/x7q+fD1r0HXdRNc=
=nJ47
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba mailing list