[Samba] Possible Filesystem Corruption with Samba 3.0.25a (with XFS and LVM)
Francis Galiegue
fg at one2team.com
Wed Jun 27 09:40:44 GMT 2007
Le mercredi 27 juin 2007, Andri a écrit :
[...]
>
> Jerome's answer was a bit off-topic anyways, because I clearly stated that
my
> incident had nothing to do with XFS per se, and the problem was that
something
> had overwritten most of my root partition.
>
> I've found XFS to be stable in that category as well, like most other
journaling
> systems. I'm not the right person to say, but I'm sure changes to a
directory's
> listing are also journaled/atomic, so actually losing the connection to an
inode
> is rare.
XFS does NOT journal data by default. I've tried and used it and found myself
with empty files after a recover. I wouldn't be surprised at all if this
superblock overwriting were indeed an XFS bug.
I wouldn't trust XFS today, even though its stability has vastly improved in
the last year. If you want to be safe, use ext3. It may not be the best
filesystem per design, but it sure is the most stable when you use Linux.
--
Francis Galiegue, fg at one2team.com
12bis rue de la Pierre Levée, 75011 PARIS
+33143381980, +33683877875
More information about the samba
mailing list