[Samba] Problems since upgrade from 3.0.23 to 3.0.25b

[Jason Baker]

> net rpc info
>
> should match. I am not sure about get local sid as it failed on my pdc.

    # net rpc info
    Password:
    Domain Name: GLASTENDERNET
    Domain SID: S-1-5-21-1194936901-2368177035-684874509
    Sequence number: 1184678015
    Num users: 100
    Num domain groups: 39
    Num local groups: 0


This seems correct.
I re-ran the smbldap_tools configuration script, so I'm quite sure all 
is correct with that.

*Jason Baker
*/IT Coordinator/


*Glastender Inc.*
5400 North Michigan Road
Saginaw, Michigan 48604 USA
800.748.0423
Phone: 989.752.4275 ext. 228
Fax: 989.752.4444
www.glastender.com <http://www.glastender.com>

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- 
Version: 3.1
GIT$ d- s: a C++$ LU+++$ P+ L++>L++++ !E--- W+++ N o? K?
w !O M !V PS PE++ Y? PGP- t 5? X+ R+ tv+ b- DI-- D++ G e+ h--- 
r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------



John Drescher wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/07, *Jason Baker* <jbaker at glastender.com 
> <mailto:jbaker at glastender.com>> wrote:
>
>>     This is saying that your user and group have confilcting sids
>>     because
>>     they should share the same base sid as everything else on the
>>     domain.
>>     To fix this you need to go through your ldap database and make sure
>>     that all sids have the same base.
>     This is very strange. I added this user using the
>     /etc/smbldap-tools/smbldap-useradd script. Which yielded a user
>     SID of S-1-5-21-3568796296-2565465778-716510536-3404 but group sid
>     S-1-5-21-1194936901-2368177035-684874509-513. If I check all my
>     other users they have a user sid such as;
>
>         S-1-5-21-1194936901-2368177035-684874509-XXXX
>
>     and a group sid such as;
>
>         S-1-5-21-1194936901-2368177035-684874509-XXXX
>
>     If I run the command: net getlocalsid on the PDC I get:
>
>         SID for domain ASTER is: S-1-5-21-3568796296-2565465778-716510536
>
>     Shouldn't the PDC SID match the user and group SIDs?
>
>
> net rpc info
>
> should match. I am not sure about get local sid as it failed on my pdc.
>  
>
>     So I deleted the user account, went into the LDAP Account Manager
>     tool from a web browser, recreated the user, and now the user SID
>     is correct:
>     S-1-5-21-1194936901-2368177035-684874509-3408
>     I then went back and tried to add a test user account using the
>     /etc/smbldap-tools/smbldap-useradd script, and I get the following
>     error:
>
>         Could not find base dn, to get next uidNumber at
>         /etc/smbldap-tools//smbldap_tools.pm line 1046, <DATA> line 283
>
>     I'm not sure whats going on, everything worked fine until I
>     upgraded to 3.0.25.
>
>
> Are you sure your  smbldap tools conf files did not get updated somehow?
>
> John
>