[Samba] Windows 98 caching too much

Daniel O'Connor darius at dons.net.au
Tue Feb 27 05:51:04 GMT 2007

On Tuesday 27 February 2007 15:53, Rashkae wrote:
> > course the caching was a problem. I'm not sure why it didn't show up in
> > XP systems though.
> Since your hosting this on BSD, which, to the best of my knowledge,
> doesn't support kernel oplocks, you probably *really* want to disable
> those if files are being modified in such a way.  There's much potential
> for all kinds of things to go horribly wrong otherwise.

Those sort of modifications are very rare.
I believe running FAM should allow it to work properly.

Seems to work OK so far anyway :)

Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20070227/4ae4b44d/attachment.bin

More information about the samba mailing list