[Samba] Valid users not working on 3.0.23d
John H Terpstra
jht at primastasys.com
Tue Feb 6 01:30:56 GMT 2007
On Monday 05 February 2007 11:05, Papo Napolitano wrote:
> Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> > On 02/02/2007 01:08 PM, Papo Napolitano wrote:
> >> Any one still having problems with "valid users" on 3.0.23d?
> >> I'm working in "security = USER" mode and with local users only.
> >> Share configuration :
> >> [private]
> >> path = /home/private
> >> valid users = papo
> >> force user = root
> >> force group = root
> >> read only = No
> >> create mask = 0600
> >> directory mask = 0700
> > [...]
> >> Second test, using a valid but not listed user :
> >> [root at julieta /]# smbclient //julieta/private -U administrator
> >> Password:
> >> Domain=[JULIETA] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23d]
> >> smb: \> mkdir 1
> >> smb: \> rmdir 1
> >> smb: \> quit
> >> This is wrong, administrator shouldn't write, not even connect
> >> to the share. "invalid users" seems to work ok though.
> >> I can provide debug logs for both versions if needed.
> >> Any hints?
> > Is your administrator in the list of 'admin users'?
> >> Thanks.-
> > Kind regards,
> No, 'admin users' is empty.
> Anyway, I'm observing the same behaviour with any account.
> Downgrading to 3.0.22 and using the same smb.conf works, I'm going to
> try 3.0.24 in the next couple of days just to be sure.
Please read the WHATSNEW.txt file that ships with Samba-3.0.x. You'll see that
the semantics of "valid users" was changed around 3.0.8.
- John T.
More information about the samba