[Samba] SMB slow by design?
admin-listas at satel-sa.com
Thu Feb 1 20:44:32 GMT 2007
Chris Garrigues escribió:
>> From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
>> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:56:25 -0800
>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:47:59AM -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote:
>>> I don't know why, but I just tried this, removind the SNDBUF AND RCVBUF,
>>> and the file share does seem snappier. I had never messed with these
>>> options, I just found several places that said setting these to 8192
>>> gave a performance increase, so I had always used them. Not any more.
>> The trouble with the Internet is that really old advice never dies :-).
> I just looked in my own config files and found:
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE
> I removed SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF.
> Of course, I have no idea why any of these were defined in the first place.
> Should any of the others be removed as well?
HP DL380 G5, MSA20 RAID5 750GB
samba 3.0.23d en suse 10.1
SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 it worked slow
the yield increase 20%
it did not give time me to prove other parameters
More information about the samba