[Samba] Difference between samba 3.0.10 and 3.0.9 - resolution

[Margaret Doll]

The problem was in the version  of 3.0.10 that I was running.  An  
upgrade to 3.0.10-1.4E.9  solved the problem.
I was originally running  E2.


On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Margaret Doll wrote:

> Another indication of the problem is that when I use
>
> smbclient -L SERVERNAME -N -d 3
>
> on the 3.0.9 system, I get a line
>
> resolve_hosts:  Attempting host lookup for name SERVERNAME<0x20>
>
> prior to the login.
>
> I do not get  this line in 3.0.10
>
> Why is 3.0.10 not attempting to resolve hosts?
>
>
> On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Margaret Doll wrote:
>
>> I upgraded one of my samba servers.  I am using the same smb.conf  
>> file that work on samba 3.0.9, but the "new" server is not  
>> announcing itself.
>>
>> From the network neighborhood, across a subnet, I do not see  
>> SERVERNAME listed under the workgroup DEPT.
>>
>>
>> 	I have disabled selinux.  I have the same iptables enabled on  
>> this system as on the prior system and another system  still  
>> running samba 3.0.9.
>>
>> smbclient  -L SERVERNAME -N
>>   ...
>> ...
>> Server			Comment
>> --------			--------------
>> SERVERNAME	Server for the dept.
>>
>> Workgroup		Master
>> ---------------		------------
>> DEPT		
>>
>>
>> In /var/samba/nmbd.log  there is a line after SERVERNAME has  
>> become  the logon server
>>
>> nmbd/nmbd_logonames.c:become_logon_server_success(124)
>>    become_logon_server_success:  Samba is now a logon server for  
>> workgroup DEPT on subnet 128.148.nnn.nnn
>> ***glibc detected  *** free():  invalid next size (fast):   
>> 0x090874c8 ***
>>
>>
>> Port 515  is open  on the 3.0.9 system although it is not listed  
>> in iptables.
>> Port 515 is not open on the 3.0.10 system.
>>
>> Any ideas on how to debug the problem?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>