OT: Re: [Samba] Researching possible windows solutions...
Aaron Kincer
kincera at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 17:02:05 GMT 2006
This could go way of topic quick. I'll simply say that in my
professional opinion that if Samba 4 can get to a stable and usable
version prior to Vista SP1, Samba will not just make an inroad to
enterprises, but pave a 10 lane interstate. If it makes it before Vista
gets out the door altogether, I can't fathom the potential impact as
there are pet projects in data centers all over the place with Samba as
it is now (based on anecdotal and non-scientific experience).
Rashkae wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:12:46PM -0400, Aaron Kincer wrote:
>
>> The EULA for XP Home explicitly states a maximum of five (5) users to
>> connect for file/print sharing services. XP Professional is ten (10).
>> This is software independent. Installing a Windows version of Samba (if
>> one exists now or in the future) would not provide you a legal way
>> around this limit even if it does provide a technical one.
>>
>> Bottom line is that legal validity notwithstanding, you can't use Samba
>> as a bypass for these limits.
>>
>
> I find it deliciously ironic that Windows Networking got a huge head start by bypassing Novell Client Access limiations. (ie, a single Windows Server would connect to the Novell Server, and re-share the data to all the clients on the network. MS was boldly advertising this tactict.) I wonder if there's traction to do the same thing with Samba :)
>
>
More information about the samba
mailing list