[Samba] Re: proposed list of parameter to remove in 3.0.23
Gerald (Jerry) Carter
jerry at samba.org
Fri May 12 16:09:47 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi Jerry ,
> isnt it fine to have a parameter if you want to talk to ldap bound to a
> different port, and isnt ldap server making it more clear ?
> Or is this just the entry in the conf and such a function can be defined
The ldapsamba and ldapsam_compat code accept an ldap URI.
SO the correct way to specify an alternative port is
'passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost:4389/'.
But again, this really is not related to the --with-ldapsam
option which is only for 2.2 compatible smb.conf settings.
People should have had time to move to the 3.0 syntax by now.
It's been over 2 & 1/2 years since 3.0.0 was released and
over 1 & 1/2 since 2.2 was discontinued.
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
"What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba