[Samba] PATCH: Binding to a local IP address when mounting smb
file system.
Ben Greear
greearb at candelatech.com
Sat Jul 15 03:21:20 GMT 2006
Ben Greear wrote:
> I have completed the first draft of the patch to allow binding to
> local addresses. Many of the binaries do not fully support this
> option since I did not know a clean way to get the config info to them,
> didn't think it was really required for my needs. As far as I can tell,
> the libraries are well supported, so the applications can have support
> added as needed. smbmount and a few others *do* support the new options,
> and I have tested that smbmount works as I had hoped.
>
> The attached patch enables this behaviour:
Seems my patch was too big for the list. Instead, please find it here:
http://www.candelatech.com/oss/samba_local_bind2.patch
>
> SMB client machine:
> eth0 IP: 172.2.2.230 netmask 255.255.255.0
> eth1 IP: 172.2.2.231 netmask 255.255.255.0
> eth2 IP: 173.2.2.232 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ...
>
> local mount dirs:
> /mnt/smb1
> /mnt/smb2
> /mnt/smb3
> ....
>
> SMB server is exporting share 'samba'
>
> I want to stress the SMB server as if many SMB clients are connecting.
> I can make arbitrarily many of the (virtual) interfaces on the client,
> but when mounting the SMB server, I want each mount point to use a specific
> interface and local IP.
>
> With my patch applied, I can bind the smbmount process to a particular
> local IP and device:
>
> smbmount //172.2.2.2/samba /mnt/smb2 -o local_dev=eth1,local_ip=173.2.2.231,username=lanforge,password=lanforge
> smbmount //172.2.2.2/samba /mnt/smb3 -o local_dev=eth2,local_ip=173.2.2.232,username=lanforge,password=lanforge
> ...
>
> As far as I can tell, the server treats each of the mounts as separate
> entities, accomplishing my goal.
>
> I would like to see this patch included in the official samba code, and
> would like your feedback on any changes needed to make that happen.
>
> I already know that I need to get rid of some of the debugging 'printf'
> statements, and will do that when the rest of the issues have been addressed.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
More information about the samba
mailing list